Pistachio Project Carviçais · Douro Superior

Financing structure

Sources and uses of capital under the two modelled scenarios.

Uses — capital requirement

Category Amount Note
Base economic CAPEX €418,236 Current base CAPEX of the project
Operations, first 5 years €240,000 Farming and overhead costs until production starts
Development and additional studies €5,000 Due diligence, analyses, studies and legal
Working capital reserve €30,000 Safety margin until production
Total uses €693,236

PEPAC support simulation

Simulation based on the planning rates used in the model. Eligibility of each line, the rate and the cap must be confirmed against the call actually open.

Eligible investment 418.2 k€
Calculated support 209.1 k€
Support as a share of uses 30.2%
Investment not covered by support 484.1 k€
First tier
50% · 500.0 k€
Second tier
40% · 1.00 M€
Support cap
400.0 k€
Note

PEPAC is not treated as secured until approval. Annual CAP payments and eco-schemes are not used as a CAPEX base.

Financing scenarios

Preferred scenario

Scenario A — with PEPAC

Public support significantly reduces the private capital required and improves investment economics.

Funding sources

PEPAC — non-repayable grant
€209,118
Investor / strategic partner equity
€450,000
Promoter capital
€30,000
Total
€689,118
Still to be financed
€4,118

A material share of the total requirement is covered by public support.

Independent scenario

Scenario B — without PEPAC

A fully private scenario allows the project to proceed without depending on incentive timetables or approval.

Funding sources

Investor / strategic partner equity
€650,000
Promoter capital
€30,000
Total
€680,000
Still to be financed
€13,236

Greater execution speed and autonomy, with higher private capital exposure.

The structure closes when this difference is zero or negative. Equity amounts are negotiable. It can be structured as a direct investment, joint venture, phased financing or a round with several investors.

Application scoring simulation (VGO)

A planning tool for the selection score. Weights and scores must be updated in line with the applicable PEPAC call.

Criterion Weight Score (0–20) Contribution
Risk management 15% 12 1.80
Investment size 20% 20 4.00
Producer organisation 25% 18 4.50
Digital solutions 20% 16 3.20
Production method and certification 20% 18 3.60
Total VGO 17.10
Minimum reference threshold
10.0
Margin above the threshold
+7.10
Scenario
Meets the threshold